I posted the Cramer video on another blog and got this comment (among others):
"I'm probably a moron for not understanding the market, but it sounds bizarre when someone says that results from one company kicked off a wave of fear and selling (or something to that effect). It all seems like some sort of chicanery.
Also, how is the government going to do something about crappy loans that have already been made? Will dropping the interest rate a little magically allow people to not default on loans?"
Posted by Arp, 10 August 2007 at 08:39 AM
Excellent question, because at first glance, we think, "Of course, it will help." But Arp is right: how can it?
Hal [my husband], who does understand the completely incomprehensible market and banking, currency, etc., explained that Cramer has trust in a simple solution. Cramer has been the benefactor of the Fed's manipulation in the market. He's seen that work over and over in stimulating the economy.
Dropping the interest rate will only prolong the inevitable. The crux of the problem is rampant speculation driven by easy money. Up until just a few months ago, if you had a pulse, you got a loan for 100%.
People saw their neighbors make $50K on a spec condo or house or lot or whatever... so said people took out an easy (read crappy) loan (often against their primary residence) and bought a flip property NEVER meaning to hold it for long, usually no more than six months.
At some mysterious moment, the notion that "it didn't matter what you paid for a property, you were going to make money when you sold it" took hold and grew roots. True appraisals went out the window. Prices were rising so fast, comparable sales data was hard enough to come by. An appraiser had to stretch the adjustable items to make comparable sales work. And forget the cost and income approaches.
IF you wanted a sale to close, you could not use the cost approach ($/sf replacement costs). If it costs $200/sf to build a new town house that is selling for over $400/sf... can a bank justify that?
Nor could you use the income approach (possible rental income). If you can only get $1500/month for a ranch style 3/2 house in new town, how can you justify a $750,000 sales price? If you borrowed 100%, your mortgage payment with taxes and insurance, would be close to IF NOT MORE THAN $7,500/month. Show me the math that makes this a smart move.
It's only smart if you buy and sell as a speculator: quick in, quick out. For awhile this was working beautifully and people were hitting big. As word spread, more and more buyers HUNGRY for the hit started shopping for property. They were willing to pay more than ever before because a) "the guy down the street paid a million for a dump and made $50k in 6 months" and b) they were competing against other hungry buyers. Biggest offer wins. And...
C) If said buyer had a pulse, the money would be there.
Properties were being bought and sold at higher and higher prices based on nothing more than the fact that you could get a loan for any price. People were making that pot of gold - often just by selling it to the next speculator in line! I watched it happen. Property "values" were going up so fast, six months was long enough to make a quick $50k. The common denominator was that ALL these buyers meant to sell that spec for their pot of gold.
The problem becomes evident when EVERYONE is jumping on this bandwagon and inventory starts skyrocketing like prices have. It's not just speculators selling, but homeowners, too. Suddenly, regular homes are bringing sales prices higher than anyone ever dreamed. Homeowners are getting rich. It just takes one or two sales to get a neighborhood all fired up and pretty soon every house on the street has a for sale sign in front of it. And why not?
Here's why not: when inventory goes up, buyers have more choices and prices fall as sellers are forced to become negotiable to snag a buyer. Lowest list price wins.
As those sellers fail to sell and run out of money to keep paying that extra mortgage, foreclosures start to appear. As foreclosures appear, lenders get jittery - some of them in downright pain like Countrywide is today. So they raise rates to get more money on the loans that are paying, plus make it harder for the unqualified to get a loan hoping for fewer foreclosures down the road. To get a loan today, you need a pulse AND an income.
Tighter controls on lending has two immediate consequences (certainly more, but from my point of view, these are the two that strike me first):
1. Since the bulk of buyers these days are still inexperienced newbie speculators hoping to make their pot of gold, they are mostly unqualified. You and I would no more lend these people money than lend it to the guy sleeping on the street. Without easy money, these baby specs cannot buy. Hence, the pool of buyers is drastically reduced. NOW you have high inventory and fewer buyers. The fun is subsiding.
2. The people who already have these loans and can't sell their spec property, need to either walk away OR refinance. The rates they got two-five years ago are adjusting up and they can't afford them. Unfortunately, with tighter controls they CAN'T refinance because the truth of their creditworthiness comes to light. PLUS they now own a property that is no longer worth what it was when they got that 100% loan in the first place. Said loan being based solely on the value of the property.
Lowering the interest rate a little MAY delay the inevitable. But it won't stop it. We are already too far down that road.
What is the inevitable? Plenty of foreclosures. Banks owning plenty of property. Some banks failing under the weight. My hope and my prayers are that it happens fast, so recovery can begin. There's as good a chance it will happen fast as that it will be long and drawn out, like some of the more dour among us predict. I don't know. No one knows. If there's one thing we do all agree on, it's that timing a market is not possible. I'm going with FAST.